Lateral Flow Testing Under the Spotlight

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

The UK medical system went into hyper drive after the government cranked up a gear. Therefore testing and tracing attracted top attention, while speed was of the essence. Quick COVID lateral flow tests seemed the answer. However, scientists now have lateral flow testing under the spotlight again. That’s because it failed to detect a third of positive cases in the Liverpool hot spot zone.

British Medical Journal Pins Lateral Flow Testing Under the Spotlight

The occasion was a community testing pilot in the UK’s tenth largest city, with half a million population. Later, British Medical Journal completed a review and concluded:

1… The pilot only detected half as many cases as polymerase chain reaction tests did

2… The pilot also failed to detect three out of every ten cases with higher viral loads

Questions are now being asked how authorities allowed these tests in aged care homes. A Scottish National Party member from across the English border is deeply worried.

‘My main concern is false reassurance,’ he wrote in two parliamentary questions. ‘There is a clear risk that those with a false negative COVID result will feel overly confident. That is, confident about mixing with vulnerable people over Christmas.’

Lateral flow tests are quick, simple ways to identify the presence of a target substance in a liquid. They avoid the need for specialized and costly equipment. However, this convenience comes at the cost of accuracy as we shall see.

Does This Mean We Should Abandon Lateral Flow Testing?

We found an explainer on the Gavi.Com Vaccine Alliance website. We have lateral flow testing under the spotlight, they seemed to say. That’s because we are confusing the twin imperatives of sensitivity and specificity.

1… Firstly, sensitivity refers to the proportion of true positives a test correctly identifies

2… Whereas specificity refers to the proportion of true negatives a test correctly spots

Now, increasing sensitivity comes at a cost of reducing specificity. But low specificity can report a subject infected, while in reality they are clear. While increasing specificity may produce false negative results.

Gavi.Com Vaccine Alliance concedes lateral flow testing can indicate trends in a pandemic. However, their speed and convenience come at the cost of accuracy. Thus extra care is necessary when interpreting and communicating results.

Related

Public Health Risk of Rapid COVID-19 Tests

A Negative Test Is Not a “Drop Your Guard” Card

Preview Image: Lateral Flow Assay Test

Video Share Link: https://youtu.be/z07CK-4JoFo

British Medical Journal Report

Gavi.Com Vaccine Alliance

Share.

About Author

Electricity has always intrigued me. I have been writing about batteries and energy storage for more than ten years, and have published over 4,000 articles on this website. During that time, I have researched developments across lead-acid, lithium-ion, sodium-ion, flow batteries, and emerging energy-storage technologies. My goal is to explain complex battery concepts in clear, practical language that anyone can understand. My writing career began unexpectedly after leaving the corporate world. What started as a search for a new direction gradually became a fascination with batteries, renewable energy, and the science that powers modern life. Writing may not have made me wealthy, but it has given me the opportunity to explore an industry that continues to evolve in remarkable ways.

Leave A Reply