Lessons From The Moss Landing Battery Fire

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

The lessons from the Moss Landing battery fire are still unfolding as we write. We won’t repeat the historic details here. Please see links to two of our earlier posts below, if you would like to catch up. Dismantling the ruins and disconnecting the remaining batteries has begun. However, the consequences for battery storage are still unclear.

Separating the Batteries from the Moss Landing Debris

An editorial in MSN News explains what a complex process this is. The lithium-ion batteries that burned were part of the original installation, but some of these escaped the fire. It could take more than a year to clear these batteries, because some are still inaccessible in the debris.

And so, unfortunately, we can still expect smaller  fires to break out again, as they have. Some of the original lithium batteries will have suffered damage, while all will have experienced extreme heat. The older generation batteries that burned were stacked together, which complicates matters further.

This original configuration used early lithium-ion chemistry, which as we know reacts aggressively in the presence of heat. This heat can spread easily between adjacent batteries in tight stacks. Nowadays they would have been in metal containers. But the lessons from the Moss Landing incident are not over.

The Lessons for Battery Storage Are Clearer

The California Public Utilities Commission has issued new safety regulations for battery energy storage. The Californian news channel confirms that these ‘enhance oversight’, and require local involvement in emergency planning.

Meanwhile, the lessons from the Moss Landing fire in terms of public health  are still unfolding. Although the California Public Utilities Commission has promised to share this information in the public domain when it is available.

Meanwhile the show must go on, because we must have bulk battery storage for renewable energy to work. It is not clear how these new regulations will affect projects approved and / or already in progress.

“It is encouraging to see these regulations,” Monterey County Supervisor Glenn Church told The Californian news channel. “It is unfortunate that it took a disaster, such as the one at Moss Landing, to compel the California Public Utilities Commission to act.”

More Information

Energy Storage and the Future of Batteries

California’s AB-303 And BESS Battery Storage

Preview Image: Moss Landing Power Plant

Share.

About Author

I tripped over a shrinking bank balance and fell into the writing gig unintentionally. This was after I escaped the corporate world and searched in vain for ways to become rich on the internet by doing nothing. Despite the fact that writing is no recipe for wealth, I rather enjoy it. I will not deny I am obsessed with it when I have the time. I live in Margate on the Kwazulu-Natal south coast of South Africa. I work from home where I ponder on the future of the planet, and what lies beyond in the great hereafter. Sometimes I step out of my computer into the silent riverine forests, and empty golden beaches for which the area is renowned. Richard

Leave A Reply