Climate Change Part 32: Climate Gate Scam Erupts 2009

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Scientists and politicians were finishing preparations for the Copenhagen Summit in November 2009. They were hoping to agree a framework for climate change mitigation beyond 2012. But that was before the Climate Gate bombshell exploded after a hacker copied thousands of files and emails from the University of East Anglia.

How the Impact of the Climate Gate Saga Spread

climate gate
Anglia Student Accommodation: Nicola J Patron: CC 3.0

The hacker drip-fed the information as the Copenhagen Summit approached. Climate change skeptics seized the opportunity to argue the information proved global warming was a scientific conspiracy. And moreover that scientists manipulated climate data and attempted to suppress critics.

Confusion spread despite the Climatic Research Unit at the University arguing the emails were out of context. And merely a reflection of an honest exchange of ideas between its dedicated scientists. However, the mainstream media followed the story greedily as the Copenhagen Summit opened on December  7, 2009. Meanwhile, it was becoming increasingly clear Climate Gate was an attempt to undermine the meeting.

The Fallout from the 2009 Climate Gate Scam

climate gate
Anglia Climatic Research Unit: ChrisO: CC 3.0

The Copenhagen Summit produced a wish list that was not binding on participants. Although they did ‘take note of it’ in a motion on the final day. Eight influential committees subsequently found no evidence of fraud or scientific misconduct. The consensus remained that human activity was causing global warming.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency concluded the petitions following Climate Gate depended on “selectively edited, out-of-context data and a manufactured controversy.” Moreover, they provided “no evidence to undermine our determination. Excess greenhouse gases are a threat to our health and welfare,” they said

However, the damage lingered on because humans prefer information that cements their beliefs. Climate change naysayers and their sponsors still trot out the discredited arguments. Those behind Climate Gate were presumably those who stood to benefit most. We will stay out of trouble and leave you to decide who they were.

Related

How Deforestation Started Climate Change

Climate Change Part 30: Barack Obama Affirms Climate Change Goals

Preview Image: The Queen’s Building, University of East Anglia

Share.

About Author

Electricity has always intrigued me. I have been writing about batteries and energy storage for more than ten years, and have published over 4,000 articles on this website. During that time, I have researched developments across lead-acid, lithium-ion, sodium-ion, flow batteries, and emerging energy-storage technologies. My goal is to explain complex battery concepts in clear, practical language that anyone can understand. My writing career began unexpectedly after leaving the corporate world. What started as a search for a new direction gradually became a fascination with batteries, renewable energy, and the science that powers modern life. Writing may not have made me wealthy, but it has given me the opportunity to explore an industry that continues to evolve in remarkable ways.

Leave A Reply